Back in
1983, the Labour Party published an election manifesto which was so
Left-of-centre it was dubbed ‘the longest suicide note in history’ by the
Conservatives and their friends in the Press. Many anti-Brexit ‘Remainers’
firmly believe that in writing to activate Article 50 and initiate Brexit, Mrs
May has penned a shorter but more lethal one. Debate rages around Westminster
and the media on what the deal will eventually be: hard Brexit, soft Brexit, terms
which are lost on the general public who are confused and fearful, but mostly
bored stiff: all Brexited-out, already. Dry Brexit will probably be the
ultimate outcome, an indigestible dog’s breakfast of dry biscuit, compromise,
sacrifice and hardship. Already it seems as though it will be a choice between
Hard Deal and No Deal, which roughly translates as disaster versus catastrophe.
We will not be surprised if, on the day after the The Deal is struck, a number
of European newspapers will carry the headline: “Choke on it, Britain, it was
your choice”. Makes you wonder about the downside of democracy a little.
Can a simple
head-counting process always be the best way to choose who governs you or what they are allowed to do? Should
we not re-consider a genuine meritocracy in which the finest minds prevail (in
intellect, achievement and altruism) rather than the grubbiest, most
self-seeking politicians? We could start by reforming the House of Lords in
that way and giving it a veto….
GB. Great Britain.
The only nation in the World which announces its pre-eminence in its very name,
brought low by self-serving politicians and a misled electorate. Salman Rushdie
talked about the days of Imperial power in a graphic metaphor “the days when
half the map of the world blushed pink with pleasure” at being part of the
British Empire (he was, of course being bitterly ironic).
Now the Empire which divorced us by national liberation, and became the Commonwealth (so we could ‘still be friends’) has to be courted again. It’s like the man who leaves his wife for another woman, takes against her and so begs his wife to accept him back. Maybe, at a price: so that means we pay one heavy price to leave the EU and another to rejoin the rest of the world, through a certain vengeful delight in exacting the best deal from the former overlords, now wielding the begging bowl instead of the gun and the bible. Great, indeed.
BUT ON THE OTHER HAND...
It turns out that the Government and the Brexiteers, far from blundering into this wilderness without a compass or an escape plan, had already been devising a scheme for making up and exceeding all the trade we have lost
with EU countries through Brexit. As befits our proud maritime history, it
centres on a very large ship, probably a decommissioned aircraft carrier, packed
to the flight deck with British products and services, British salespeople and
diplomats, and British crew. Even the passengers’ entertainment will have a
distinctly British flavour with Sir Cliff Richard (half-Indian but we’re very inclusive)
providing the cabaret and his friend Sue Barker running nightly sports
Quiznites. For it will be a very long voyage, calling at practically every port
in the world, and selling ourselves and our products. Despite his recent
protestations, it will be captained by David ‘Pig in a Poke’ Cameron, assisted by Paddy
Ashdown (formerly of the Special Boat Service), and the ships purser will be John
Prescott (on grounds of previous experience): a coalition of all the talents, a
dream team, no question.
The ship
has been re-named ‘Titanic McArkface’.
Even as I write it is being loaded at Southampton with legendary British
products and iconic miniature service outlets are being installed in a capacious Mall:
Marmite, Oxford marmalade, Marks & Spencer, Dyson, Aston Martin (many know
the cars from Bond films, so they practically
sell themselves to the super-rich), British Home Stores (no, scrub that)
Shetland knitwear, whisky and haggis (decision pending), Wimpy Bars, Chicken
Cottage, Ladbrokes, Poundland, Sainsburys, Prince Charles’ Duchy products,
Eccles cakes, Mr Kipling, Taffi Indian Steel, miners’ lamps, speed humps,
British bobbies, Royal Family souvenirs, boxed cassette sets of The Archers,
red pillar boxes doubling as wi-fi hotspots: the list is almost endless. Deck-space is devoted to the outdoor aspects of
British culture with tiny Wimbledons, Henleys, and Grand Nationals. Jeremy
Clarkson & Lewis Hamilton will host a permanent go-kart grand prix
involving teams in each venue. There will just about be space for a display
cabinet housing all the international trophies won by the England football team
since 1966. Quite a small cabinet. An empty cardboard box, actually.
The British
are coming! This commercial and cultural invasion will ensure our place on the world
map, as a little speck off Europe, but with limitless
potential. It is true that no trading arrangements have yet been made with
any of the embarkation points targeted, nor indeed permission to land granted.
But these things take time. There will always be unhelpful responses from
nations who fear the might of British mercantile endeavour, because they dread
the competition (Russia: “Our nuclear submarines will sink your ship”; Germany:
“we will beat you on penalties”; France: “Pff. We will ignore your stupid ship”;
America: “You think you’ve got problems, we can trump yours”). We will rise above them and show our own detractors
what kind of stuff we’re made of. STOP PRESS: we have just received a very
welcome invitation from poor Syria (from their International Strategic
Incendiary Supplies people, if we have interpreted the acronym correctly), to mount a demonstration of our entire portfolio
of arms products, with the promise of firm orders, if we bring sufficient supplies
with us. Heads we win, tails we lose them.
Editor’s note: while this piece may contain one
or two factual inaccuracies, it is no more fanciful than the Brexit claims for
the ease of making future trading arrangements outside the EU.
Generally speaking the Room 101 Exit Lounge has been restricted to things one would like to get rid of but perhaps it's time to broaden the canvas to include people who have polluted our society in some way, usually in pursuit of power, wealth, ideology or sexual gratification:
Jimmy Savile, Rolf Harris, all the celebrities who have abused their power, to abuse children or adults, Dr. Harold Shipman (who killed at least 250 of his patients), Margaret Thatcher (considerations of space preclude a full list of her crimes against this society), MPs who use/d our money to feather their interchangeable nests via outrageous expenses claims, tax havens without which many of our vital services could be properly funded, through increased tax receipts; The Sun and The Star, because they are toxic; Piers Morgan, Katie Hopkins, The Daily Express and the Daily Mail, because they have dropped any pretence of truthful, objective journalism.
It is not often we can capture more than one of these miscreants in a single shot but.....
The depraved monster...
with Jimmy Savile
Jimmy Savile, with a weapon of mass destruction
Britain still has the most reliably beautiful countryside of anywhere in the world. I would hate to be part of the generation that allowed that to be lost. Bill Bryson
Close to a billion people - one-eighth of the world's population - still live in hunger. Each year 2 million children die through malnutrition. This is happening at a time when doctors in Britain are warning of the spread of obesity. We are eating too much while others starve. Jonathan Sacks
It is crystal clear to me that if Arabs put down a draft resolution blaming Israel for the recent earthquake in Iran it would probably have a majority, the U.S. would veto it and Britain and France would abstain. Amos Oz
If the British Empire is fated to pass from life into history, we must hope it will not be by the slow process of dispersion and decay, but in some supreme exertion for freedom, for right and for truth. Winston Churchill !
So this is a country? Rose Milner, my Lithuanian Jewish grandmother, on arrival in Birmingham from Kovno, 190?
So much better than God Save the Queen.....
Only the most paper thin excuse for this one: Paul Simon wrote it on a Romford Station platform on his first visit to England, waiting for a train. The romance of it all!
You may never forgive me for this, but it has England in the title..... Roger Miller's execrable 'Engerland swings like a pendulum do' . Sorry.
I used to read The Times Higher Education
Supplement, not slavishly but fairly often. I would read two columns before
anything else (if anything else): Laurie Taylor’s column was always good value, and
I had a lot of respect for him. Once I sat opposite him on a train from King’s
Cross to York and disciplined myself to respect his space and not talk to him
as he was working in a concentrated way.
The other column
was Don’s Diary: every week an academic was invited to share his or her (but
invariably his) activities for the past week with the readership for an interesting
cross-section of life within the ivory towers. I found it hilarious. It was
clear that the composition process was like this;
1) Go through diary for the past year
and record all your most impressive engagements, appointments, publication
launches, distinguished visitors, media appearances and mentions.
2) Select as many of these as could
credibly be squeezed into 7 days, allowing for a certain amount of doubling up,
or more, e.g. “Thursday: bumped into my old friend Stephen Hawking at Heathrow,
and it transpired were both going to address the UN, before the jolly at
Harvard on “is there a future for astrophysics?”. Hope he’ll give me a chance
on the way back to work on the telly script I’m doing with Brian Cox on
Friday. Have promised to give the lad a little fraternal coaching on presentational
skills, you can’t get by on good looks alone – that’s what I’ve found.
3) Mail article to THES
So one day I sat
down and wrote a gentle satire on the column and sent it in to the THES. I
thought it might amuse them. Apparently not, they rejected it. So how did I
manage to get a little bit of it in the THES a few weeks later? I didn’t, but
mysteriously, the best gag in the piece (somewhat ‘incorrect’ but we’re all
grown-ups, aren’t we?) appeared in the middle of another regular contributor's column soon afterwards. It’s not impossible that another person can think up exactly the
same gag, or that a sub-editor with a hangover cuts and pastes erratically:
either explanation is preferable to common plagiarism.
This is the spoof it came from:
HYPERDON’S DIARY
Monday: That very special time of year: no
students. There is a God, and I have a time-share in Paradise. Of course one
loves the students, but much as one loves a puppy despite its messing. Now the
place is tidier, and there is time, for example, to polish a Personal
Strategic Plan to boost my career trajectory to the star-spangled heights.
Before I can finish the thought, Paxman calls to get me on Newsnight again. The
man’s a bore, frankly, the headmaster bit is getting tedious and the format is
creaky, but we compromise on a to-camera piece on the ‘iconography of chavs’.
I’ll have to get something to wear. Maybe string them along until the new Paul
Smith collection comes in. Suits you, sir as my students kept saying when I
wore the Armani to Graduation. Reverie interrupted by young female person at my
door. “Are you the professor?” she ask. “Yes, and are you the student?” I
reply.
She wants to know if she can appeal against her degree result on health grounds. Apparently she had a fleeting sexual encounter just before the exams with a lorry driver in a motorway services lorry park and contracted a nasty infection. “So you think you may be HGV positive?” I suggest, scarcely able to contain my delight at this mordant witticism. No reaction. I explain that unless said driver was a moonlighting member of staff or external examiner, her cause is doomed. “Better to have loved and lost a 2:1 than never to have loved at all” I comfort her, and give her the usual homily about some of my best friends and colleagues having 2:2s (while ever so subtly indicating which).
She wants to know if she can appeal against her degree result on health grounds. Apparently she had a fleeting sexual encounter just before the exams with a lorry driver in a motorway services lorry park and contracted a nasty infection. “So you think you may be HGV positive?” I suggest, scarcely able to contain my delight at this mordant witticism. No reaction. I explain that unless said driver was a moonlighting member of staff or external examiner, her cause is doomed. “Better to have loved and lost a 2:1 than never to have loved at all” I comfort her, and give her the usual homily about some of my best friends and colleagues having 2:2s (while ever so subtly indicating which).
Tuesday: Put finishing touches to “Advertisements for
Mercedes: de-constructing Exchange & Mart”, a think-piece for “Makin’
Waves”, the new monthly bible of Psychomedia Studies. I didn’t really want to do it,
but they pointed out that they pay. So I thought of a deterrent figure and
multiplied it by 5 which they accepted by return of email, and that’s my
upmarket gym/spa/treatments for this year paid for.
Notice colleague from Sociology walking across to the Barbara Windsor Building, sporting a pony-tail. Shudder. With fashion you have to read the runes, and when my accountant got a pony-tail, mine had to come off, like right now. Mind you, Brian Cox doesn’t seem to care about these things. The writing was easy: in the Scrabble and Crossword Dictionaries I found enough incomprehensible words of over four syllables to guarantee acceptance: the referees won’t dare admit that they don’t understand it.
Notice colleague from Sociology walking across to the Barbara Windsor Building, sporting a pony-tail. Shudder. With fashion you have to read the runes, and when my accountant got a pony-tail, mine had to come off, like right now. Mind you, Brian Cox doesn’t seem to care about these things. The writing was easy: in the Scrabble and Crossword Dictionaries I found enough incomprehensible words of over four syllables to guarantee acceptance: the referees won’t dare admit that they don’t understand it.
p.m Fall asleep at desk writing External Examiner
report for ambitious new university in Home Counties. To think that only 10
years ago they were teaching hairdressing and plastering. Social mobility is a
wonderful thing. Follow usual formula: praise hard-pressed staff, salute
standards and deride hotel accommodation. This year I struggled to sleep to the
sounds of Knights and Damsels Nite in the themed Heritage Bar beneath my room.
Wednesday: I don’t believe it. The VC has had the
temerity to ring again and ask me to be a Focus Team Champion. You may well
ask. It’s part of another push in the campaign to make Universities More Like
Real Life (i.e. Business). Trouble is, the business concepts are usually well
past their sell-by date by the time they reach our shelves, and stank even when
they were new. I patiently explain that had I wanted such a title I would have
become Regional Sales Manager for a firm of Midlands caravan manufacturers,
presenting gilded plastic statuettes at conferences to the salesman shifting
the most units, to the over-amplified strains of “Simply the Best”. After a
short silence, the VC quotes me some Greatest Hits Shakespeare (as scientists
and engineers are wont to do): “A rose by any other name would smell as sweet”,
quoth he. “So would dogshit”, quoth I.
Thursday: Allow myself a lie-in. A pain au chocolat and 1.5 cafetieres of Colombian later I head for
the University for a date with teaching destiny. Adjacent to the main building
is a disused bingo hall, apparently the first in the country. It is being
converted into a large lecture theatre (and weekend conference centre, of
course) by a big firm of cowboys-in-suits with a smart logo and a website address on
all their tools, clothing and vehicles. I want to suggest a new mission
statement for them – ‘we deconstruct construction’ but fear it may be too abstract
for the concrete business! Because their tender was by far the highest, the
University naturally judged it to be the best. I wondered if they guaranteed
delays as well, for extra authenticity.
I am to be
photographed surveying the progress for the University ‘newspaper’ (Ed:
H.Goering). Moral dilemma: be Health and Safety role model and wear hard-hat
(but sacrifice the Nicky Clarke haircut), or eschew headgear and risk a bolt
embedded in cranium, like some Frankenstein expansion kit. Unusually, rationality
triumphs over vanity. Auditorium looks acoustically suspect and as for the
ambience, when I come to ask the students the date of Potterell’s classic paper on
‘discourse jockeys’ will some ghostly presence shout out “Two fat ladies!” As
we are leaving, in comes Adele and her people: she is booked to sing one song
at the opening ceremony (she has connections with the area), and graciously
agrees to a ‘selfie’ with me which will guarantee my cred with a range of
audiences for many years to come.
pm
Timetable
planning for next year. The trick is to negotiate the twin demands of Teaching
Quality and Research Output, each of which requires most of our time so it is
impossible. We are caught twixt Scylla and Charybdis, between the Devil and the
Deep Blue Sea (or between the HEFCE and the RAE, as I used to say). Naturally I
favour the latter, being somewhat sanguine about the teaching of the new
barbarian hordes. Last year when I drily observed that the Learning Objectives
of the first year course were to have everyone reading to themselves without
their lips moving, half the class visibly brightened. ‘Glamour’ mag calls for
instant quote on ‘The Cougar & the Gap Years'. I should know?
Friday: Phone rings occasionally; timing calls
and invoicing callers for a proportional fee has reduced traffic hugely. Mails
brings fresh crop pf publishers’ blurbs (bin after cursory glance) and
publicity for conferences. Now there’s an interesting communicational
phenomenon: the conference. Probably the least efficient way of gathering
information known to Humankind, yet they still flourish. Why? I suppose the PR
and horse-trading saves departments thousands in job-advertising, and the 3 or
4 days off the leash saves a few marriages. Then there’s that schoolboyish and
unforgivably incorrect scanning for the most attractive woman (or man) on Day 1
and constructing elaborate fantasies about them during tedious moments –
however attractive (or not) they may be in absolute terms. Show me the delegate
who denies this and I’ll show you a liar. Personally I don’t go to conferences
any more unless they are somewhere hot or exotic. If I should grace an English
one, I will always leave before the farewell social: the sight of balding,
bespectacled, bearded, tweed-jackets-and-Hush-Puppies (and that’s just the
women!) doing the Twist or becoming a Flower Child/disco king/punk all over
again, turns the stomach. Not to mention those bright-eyed females doing their
groovy moves (subtext: I was a bit of a raver). Dancing to rock music should be
illegal after 40, except in private between consenting adults.
Saturday: Drop in at La Lune et le Perroquet for a quick Pernod before the petanque match: away against some admen from a wine bar in Fulham.
Win and make useful contact for the Slogan and Semiology book.
Sunday: Depart 11.07, BA713 destination - my little place in Umbria. Not
only does stewardess recognise me, she remembers what I drink. Getting there, my friend, getting there.
Dr. DON ROMIN,
Professor of Psychocultural Relations at the new University of Walford
No comments:
Post a Comment