I am a man
of letters. Not in the sense of being some kind of literary figure or scholar (‘could do
better’ has been the verdict on those efforts). However, a lot of my conscious
life has been spent reading, or putting letters together into words,
sentences, paragraphs and pages, articles and books, and now a play; not to
mention the oral version, in lectures, seminars, tutorials, conference papers
and speeches at funerals or weddings. Where would I have been without them?
Stuck for something to do, I suppose, though music, football and woodwork have
been equally satisfying, at times. Originally I thought that a Man of Letters was someone
who wrote a lot of letters to other men of letters, which they did, of course.
Or possibly it referred to the number of letters after their name, their degrees and qualifications. I did do quite well on that score, eventually,
particularly if I included THFC, AA, BBC2, C4, UK and OK. Then there’s the
question of my acquaintance with French letters: something which is best left
unexplored here.
Looking
back, this path seems to have been inevitable: education in good primary and
secondary schools in the 50s and 60s in a middle class area of North London,
reinforced a respect for language that had already been instilled by a highly
intelligent father who devoured The Guardian whole, every evening (though to my
knowledge, he only ever read one novel - Portnoy’s Complaint - which I got him to try and tempt him into
fiction,with laughter and inspired smut). It didn’t work, but then most novels
would be a bit of a disappointment after that masterpiece.
That era,
in the late 50s, before television exerted its stranglehold on leisure time,
now in turn demoted by gaming and the Net, was prime time for children’s
reading. Good middle class children were read to every night, long after they
could do it themselves. It was a comforting ritual of one-to-one, exclusive,
quality time with a parent who was warm and fond, a reassuring base to touch
every night. My generation filled this space with Winnie the Pooh; my
daughters’ version was Where the Wild Things Are, and Dogger, then an entirely
innocent title. Books were loved, re-read endlessly, because of
their comfort-value. It was a huge leap from this to adult fiction: there was
no literature for teenagers as such, because teenagers had not been delineated
as a separate species. They existed as a phase between childhood and adulthood,
had spots and tantrums, but were soon assimilated to the adult world by
dressing them in clothes identical to their parents’, who also dominated the 'radiogram', with Bing Crosby records.
For example, at my grammar school, because of
the hangover of habits from post-war austerity, sixth formers did not have to
wear uniforms, to spare their parents the expense of buying blazers which would
only be worn for a year or two. The result was that the 17 year- old boys did
not come to school in Italian suits and winkle-pickers, as they wished, but the
uniform of middle-aged men: checked tweed sports jackets, cavalry twill
trousers, all in mushroom brown or lovat green; the more daring might have an
open-neck shirt and affect a cravat, still scented by their father’s ubiquitous
Old Spice.
Happy,
peaceful days, on the surface. But there was an undercurrent, becoming a
groundswell, of changing attitudes amongst teenagers and others. It was seeded
by rock’n’roll, and in the UK by a complacent, patriarchal Conservative
government which believed itself to be born to rule, and thus indulging its worst
vices: call-girls, corruption and the conviction that they could do anything
and get away with it, fix it or suppress it with libel actions. Wrong. Where
were ‘the letters’ in all of this? They were shaped into Private Eye, That Was
the Week That Was, The Establishment club, The Liverpool Poets, and the
‘Kitchen Sink’ novels, plays and films: young avant garde authors like John
Osborne and Alan Sillitoe produced gritty social realist plots, featuring the
working classes, sometimes even from a working class perspective, and delivered
an electric shock to the dahlings of West End theatre and the well-elocuted
Rank starlets of the showbizzy film industry.
Within the
space of a few years a critical counter-culture had developed. Satire became a
growth industry and lacerated its ruling class targets. The obscenity trials of
Lady Chatterley and Oz comic held the justice system up to ridicule (Judge:
“But would one want one’s servants to read this material?”) and for the rulers,
the suspicion that there was an earthquake coming grew: seismic rumblings
spelling out no respect, revolution, the dreaded socialism – or at least a
Labour government, was threatening.
Slowly the
letters began to spell out The Writing on the Wall for the culture of the older
generation. In a way it was sad, they were a generation who had gone through World
War I as children, the General Strike, The Depression, unemployment in the 30s,
got hurt or slaughtered in World War 2, survived post-war austerity (that is, real
austerity, not Osborne’s austerity-lite) only to find that just as the PM was
assuring them they’d ‘never had it so good’, the younger generation was putting
the boot into everything they valued, having first kicked the chair and pulled
the rug from under them. It was a hard landing.
An early
symptom of a counter-culture was the Folk Music revival: one half the
ear-cupping British traditonalists like Ewan MaColl, but who mixed in gritty
industrial ballads (‘Dirty Old Town’) with the rural fol-de-rols of fairs,
hedgerows and love in the haystacks. The other half was American-influenced,
trade union ballads and the travelling songs of the hobos riding the railroad
cars; all very authentic, lonely and hard-bitten, but the British hard travellin' men, under cover
of darkness, returned home to Epsom or Barnet, and their job in the Town Hall
as usual.
America had
been quicker than England to vest some importance in song lyrics and use them to
proclaim a message. While mainstream music still rhymed moon with June for
decades, there had been folk song lyrics which protested human rights issues in a
tradition which came from Woody Guthrie, through Pete Seeger to Bob Dylan (I’m
not really counting Peter, Paul and Mary who were very nice, but really more
like ‘lounge protest’ in DJs and a cocktail dress: good lyrics from other
people, and more sugar than Coke. In the UK the folk music tradition was more
like the music version of Morris dancing. The single figure which put protest
songs on the map, united the traditions and provided the libretto for Civil
Rights and anti-war protests was Bob Dylan.
He and the Beatles provided the vocabulary for 20th Century music from 1962 onwards: it was often a kind of poetry in the language of experience, including the experience of the oppressed, not just the drive-in movies.
He and the Beatles provided the vocabulary for 20th Century music from 1962 onwards: it was often a kind of poetry in the language of experience, including the experience of the oppressed, not just the drive-in movies.
To be
continued: you can wake up, I’ve finished for now…
I wrote these two pieces for Facebook recently. There was virtually no response from anyone, which surprised me, given the importance of the issue and the fact that I'd voiced strong opinions which some people would be likely to disagree with. So I drew attention to this:
Still little response, which was odd given that a Martin Luther King quote that I posted at the same time. which was accidentally appropriate, received several likes and shares.
I wrote these two pieces for Facebook recently. There was virtually no response from anyone, which surprised me, given the importance of the issue and the fact that I'd voiced strong opinions which some people would be likely to disagree with. So I drew attention to this:
Still little response, which was odd given that a Martin Luther King quote that I posted at the same time. which was accidentally appropriate, received several likes and shares.
THE SUNDAY ITEMS: midweek edition (it'll all be history by Sunday)
simply beautiful |
My dear friend Harminder Jhalli bought me some Lily O'Brien hand-made chocolates for my birthday. This one is 'Simply Chocolate'. Really? Looks like a Work of Art to me..... |
A weekly series of gripes, grumbles, and sour grapes from a misanthropic Grumpy Old Man, who prefers to remain anonymous. Two which should be relegated to the Room of Shame, for starters:
Very elderly men in suits or jackets, wearing trainers; young men in suits, wearing baseball caps. They don't go together, they are a contradiction in terms, they clash, they suggest opposites, they are antagonistic, they highlight the old man's fragility and the young man's immaturity: they should be banned.
Stone cladding: the most ghastly product in British architecture and design since the beginning of recorded history. Covering your house in pre-fabricated multi-coloured sheets of synthetic material is not going to conjure up a fairy-tale country cottage, particularly on the North Circular near Neasden. You can picture some toxic factory on an industrial estate in Walsall where the owners chortle as they count the thousands of pounds they have charged each gullible householder who expected home improvement but got an irrevocable eyesore.
Be honest, you feel better now...
No comments:
Post a Comment