NINETEEN SIXTY-TWO
Sweet
little sixteen: not tall, not through the spotty period, not in possession of a
girl-friend but aching to have one, and not happy. Not least because I had just
started A-level sciences, in order to be a doctor, help humanity and have a nice
car, only to find myself bored out of my skull. The prospect of trying to get
grades in these subjects good enough to get to university and change direction
was deeply depressing.
Then came
October, bringing two seismic game-changers. On the 5th of October
1962 the Beatles released “Love me do”. It only went to number 17 in the charts
but everybody sensed that something special had happened. There was no
Beatlemania at first, just a sense of the new, an excitement, a rumbling which
foretold an explosion, like the lightning anticipating a thunderclap. One
afternoon, after school, I was ironing some shirts in the morning room while my
mother was cooking close by. “Love me do” came on the radio, and I stepped back
from the ironing board to try a quick burst of The Twist, which I’d just
mastered in my bedroom. My mother laughed, with an edge of alarm and incomprehension:
“Don’t be so silly, you look ridiculous!” Suddenly I realised that I didn’t
mind her scorn, in fact relished it: it was the first glimmer of light from an
opening door: independence and the rejection of parental authority.
When you
see the first shots of The Beatles it’s striking how shorttheir hair was. But it was still shocking to the older
generation, let alone their later incarnation. Very soon they became the four mop-tops,
the loveable, cheeky, Scouse rascals who ran rings round the traditional TV
presenters and music journalists, and captured my cohort as fans – all around
the world. The music was totally original, yet of the moment, passed the old
grey whistle test, melodic, rocking, and, remarkably, struck a chord that
resonated across all the barriers of age, race and nationality, everywhere. Beatlemania
simply became the most immense show-business phenomenon ever.
They might
easily have had a very short career: 23 days precisely. Because from October 16
to 28 the US and the USSR were engaged in a terrifying bout of arms-wrestling,
a flirtation with all-out nuclear war, which seemed a very real possibility, during the
Cuba Crisis. The Cuban government had allowed the Soviet Union to build
missile-launching sites on their territory 90 miles from the US mainland. Every
sizeable city in America could be destroyed, at will. Ships carrying the
missiles from Russia were steaming for Cuba. The US imposed a blockade. There
was stalemate and
paralysis, and the world held its breath, looking on in horror and
disbelief as
this first nose-to-nose confrontation between Kennedy and Khruschev,
representing the super powers, played out in slo-mo. People bought tinned food;
some constructed ludicrously inadequate shelters; the Government’s Civil
Defence advice (e.g.’stick brown paper on all your windows’) was exposed for
the sham that it was: there is no defence against nuclear weapons. At the
Eleventh Hour Khruschev had the courage to pull the ships back and a compromise
was reached. Phew. Bit of a close thing, but no-one who lived it will forget
how it felt: the first time since Hiroshima and Nagasaki that we had truly
apprehended the holocaust of nuclear war – because we had to.
Not long
afterwards I joined CND and met FA there: it was my first BOGOF, a political
identity and a girlfriend. We lived happily ever after, though not together. Bob Dylan was the first chronicler of the nuclear age at this time. He wrote Talkin’ World War III Blues, a wry, surrealist skit, a dream about
being a survivor in the post-nuclear desert: “you can be in my dream if I can
be in yours” was the line that stuck in my mind.
BRUVVAFROMANNUVAMUVVA
You know that feeling when you are looking at
someone, and there is a bell ringing: they look like someone or something else,
but you can’t quite put your finger on it? I get that when I look at Donald
Trump. The improbable hair, the eyes, the contorted mouth, the
pink/orange skin that is somehow over-inflated – that’s it, he looks like a
blow-up sex-doll...
Inflatable sex doll Donald Trump
SIXTEEN: licence to wed
I think people can still get married at sixteen, if they have parental consent. Given that the costs of marriage and divorce are phenomenally high in both financial and emotional terms, this seems like a potential car-crash for everyone concerned. It would be interesting to know what the average longevity for these marriages is, compared to 'adult' marriages, over 40% of which now end in divorce. My money is on a shorter span and higher proportion. How can youths of 16 conceivably have had enough experience of relationships to make an informed choice of partner, or even know their own needs and temperament? The limit was made law in the days before living together had become widely accepted. A rational policy would be to require potential partners to live together for a 2 year period, until 18, in rented accommodation and without starting a family, after which they would be fee to do whatever they wish, but without the complications of property ownership and children, saving a lot of grief if they split up.
QUOTE/UNQUOTE
Nikita Khruschev on the Cuban Missile Crisis:
They talk about who won and who lost. Human reason won. Mankind won.
On the possibility of the Soviet Union rejecting communism (1955):
Those who wait for that must wait until a shrimp learns to whistle.
John F. Kennedy:
The great enemy of the truth is very often not the lie, deliberate, contrived and dishonest, but the myth, persistent, persuasive and unrealistic.
Too often we... enjoy the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought.
No comments:
Post a Comment